This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.

Advertising Law Updates

| 1 minute read

Liar Liar Pants On Fire! The FTC Goes After Fake Online Reviews

The FTC announced two settlements today involving fake product reviews.  

In the first case, against Devumi LLC and its CEO, the FTC alleged that the defendants sold fake indicators of social media influence, including fake followers, subscribers, views, and likes, to users of various large social media platforms, including Youtube and Pinterest, among others.  As the FTC alleged, "fake indicators of social media influence may undermine the influencer economy and consumer trust in the information that influencers provide," and peddling them violates the FTC Act. The settlement imposes a $2.5 million judgment and bans the defendants from selling (or assisting others in selling) social media influence to users of third-party social media platforms and from making misrepresentations about the social media influence of any person or entity.

In the second case, against Sunday Riley Skincare and its CEO, the FTC alleged that the company's managers, and its CEO, posted reviews of their pricey branded cosmetic products on a large beauty site using fake accounts created to hide their identity, and requested that other Sunday Riley Skincare employees -- including their interns --  do the same. Employees were told what attributes of the products to tout in their reviews, what to say, and also directed them to "dislike" any negative reviews of the products. Needless to say, according to the complaint, not only were these reviews false and misleading, but they also failed to disclose that the reviewers were employed by the company whose products they were reviewing. 

The proposed consent order prohibits the respondents from misrepresenting the status of any endorser or person reviewing the product, from making any representation about any consumer or other product endorser without clearly and conspicuously disclosing any unexpected material connection, and requires the respondents to instruct their employees and agents to do the same.

The FTC, like state Attorneys General and NAD, clearly cares a lot about the power of customer reviews and the potential for consumer deception and marketplace distortion created by fake ones and ones that hide the bias of the reviewer.  While it may be difficult for marketers to get customers to post organic reviews about their products, they must resist the temptation to buy the love.  This is not likely to be the last enforcement action we see about the types of practices at issue in these cases.  

"Posting deceptive or inaccurate information online pollutes the e-commerce marketplace and prevents consumers from making informed purchasing decisions." ~The FTC

Tags

ftc, customer reviews, fake reviews, endorsements