Yesterday, the Federal Trade Commission announced that it entered into settlement agreements with the operators of so-called copycat military websites -- sites that the FTC says "targeted people seeking to join the armed forces and tricked them by falsely claiming to be affiliated with the military in order to generate sales leads for post-secondary schools." 

As part of the settlements, the defendants -- who operated army.com, armyenlist.com, and navyenlist.com -- agreed to relinquish these and other domain names and to stop the practices that the FTC said they used to deceive consumers. 

The FTC alleged that the defendants operated websites that appeared to be official recruiting websites affiliated with the U.S. military.  When consumers visited the websites, the sites asked consumers to submit personal information, in order to receive information about enlisting.  The FTC alleged that, instead, the sites sold the information as marketing leads to post-secondary schools for $15 to $40 per lead. 

This action is part of a larger FTC initiative to combat government imposter schemes.  

While this may be an extreme case, there are some important take-aways here.  First, it's important never to falsely create the impression that something has been endorsed by, or is affiliated with, the U.S. government.  Second, the FTC is particularly concerned about marketing to members of the military, because of the concern that the audience may be more vulnerable to deception.  It's important to keep that in mind when advertising to a military audience.  Third, don't tell consumers you're collecting information for only one purpose and then use it for another purpose.  And, finally, the FTC continues to be concerned about misleading formats.  When creating online content, it's important not to mislead consumers about who the source of the content is.